DISCOURSE IN DIVERSE ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUES EMPLOYED BY LANGUAGE TEACHERS

  • Ida Ayu Made Sri Widiastuti Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
  • I Gde Putu Agus Pramerta Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
  • I Nyoman Suparsa Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
  • Ni Luh Sukanadi Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

Abstrak

Classroom assessment is a process of collecting and utilizing information on student learning outcomes carried out by teachers. The process of collecting and utilizing this information is used to determine the level of achievement of students towards competency attainment. The results of the assessment can provide an overview of the competence and progress of the students. This study explores the principles of classroom-based assessment carried out by teachers in real classroom settings. The study revealed that teachers employed various assessment techniques due to their various understanding of classroom assessment. Teachers had different views on how the implementation of classroom assessment and methods of assessments. Several forms of assessment conducted by teachers include a collection of a portfolio, product, project, performance, and written tests. However, some teachers still conducted those forms of assessment inappropriately. This study implies that further educational training on classroom assessment should be developed by educational stakeholders.

Referensi

Alkharusi, H. (2015). An Evaluation of The Measurement of Perceived Classroom Assessment Environment. International Journal of Instruction, 8(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2015.824a

Box, C., Skoog, G., & Dabbs, J. M. (2015). A Case Study of Teacher Personal Practice Assessment Theories and Complexities of Implementing Formative Assessment. American Educational Research Journal, 52(5), 956–983. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215587754

Gan, Z., He, J., & Liu, F. (2019). Understanding Classroom Assessment Practices and Learning Motivation In Secondary EFL Students. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 783–800. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.2.783

Karimi, M. N., & Shafiee, Z. (2014). Iranian EFL Teachers’ Perceptions of Dynamic Assessment: Exploring The Role of Education And Length of Service. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(8), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n8.10

Mantra, IBN, Widiastuti, I.A.M.S. (2019). An Analysis of EFL Students’ Writing Ability to Enhance Their Micro and Macro Writing Skill. International Journal of Linguistics and Discourse Analytics, 1 (1), 29-34

Mantra, I. B. N., Astawa, I. N., & Handayani, N.D. (2019). Usability of Innovative Learning Models in Higher Education. International Journal of Social Sciences,2(1), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v2n1.91

Mantra, I. B. N., Suwandi, I. N., Sukanadi, N. L., Astuti, N. K. W., & Indrawati, I. G. A. P. T. (2019). Teachers’ Competences in Dealing with Instructional Constraints to Develop Higher Quality of Learning. International Journal of Social Sciences, 2(1), 44-48. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v3n1.95

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2020). Dissonances between Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices of Formative Assessment in EFL Classes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.1315a

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., & Saukah, A. (2017). Formative Assessment in EFL Classroom Practices. Bahasa Dan Seni: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni Dan Pengajarannya, 45(1), 050–063. https://doi.org/10.17977/um015v45i12017p050

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S. (2018). Teachers’ Classroom Assessment and Grading Practices. SHS Web of Conferences, 42(42), 00052. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200052

Yahiji, K., Otaya, L. G., & Anwar, H. (2019). Assessment Model of Student Field Practice at Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teaching Training in Indonesia: A Reality and Expectation. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 251–268. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12117a

Yamtim, V., & Wongwanich, S. (2014). A Study of Classroom Assessment Literacy of Primary School Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2998–3004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.696

Diterbitkan
2020-09-01